For me, he was my first introduction in forensic psychiatry.
On Wednesday, one of my patients scheduled himself for a "probable cause" hearing. To put this into context, you have to understand the way inpatient psychiatric settings work. As you can imagine, most people who are placed into psychiatric settings don't want to be there. They're manic, psychotic or the remnant of a failed suicide. They want to go home and they are tired of the rules/regulations. But how can you hold someone in a hospital against their will?
In the state of Louisiana, you first have to order a Physician's Emergency Certificate (PEC). In order to do this, any physician can deem a patient to be either a 1) danger to himself 2) danger to others or 3) gravely disabled (unable to seek food, shelter or take medications). This PEC allows the patient to be legally held for 72 hours. To extend that time, a Coroner's Emergency Certificate (CEC) must be issued. The coroner must physically go and see the patient and issue a CEC. If the coroner deems the patient to be a danger and issues a CEC, the patient can be held for an additional 12 days. After that, a judicial commitment must be filed which can hold a patient up to an additional 6 months. But only a judge can decide that last one.
A patient also has certain safeguards to ensure that their rights aren't being violated. One of these is the issuing of a probable cause hearing. In this hearing, the patient can deem that the hospital did not have probable cause to issue a CEC and can go in front of a judge to challenge that.
My patient did just that on Wednesday. Now, to make this the perfect storm, Wednesday just happens to be the day that my attending physician was called for jury duty. Normally an attending goes to this hearing, but for this day, it was me. I nervously drive up to the courthouse to make my 1 pm appointment.
I walk into the courthouse and make it through the metal detectors (as a side note, the security just said "go ahead, doc" and let me through without going through the detector - the white coat does wonders). I walk upstairs and meet with the hospital's lawyer, a nice guy about my age who seemed to understand the process really well. He helped put me at ease. Awkwardly, the patient was one bench over, muttering about how I tried to befriend him and then betrayed him. Awkward.
We walked into the courthouse and stood when the judge entered. I was the first witness called. They asked me to state my credentials and where I went to medical school. They asked me how long I knew the patient and this interestingly phrased question.
"Doctor Mohiuddin, in your expert opinion, what is the psychiatric diagnosis of this patient?"
Did they know I've only been practicing psychiatry for a month? Did they know that at this point, I'm really just practicing? Nervously and taken aback, I answered.
"Schizoaffective disorder - bipolar type"
They proceeded to ask me questions about the patient's medication compliance, his behavior on the wards, etc. Then it was done. No further questions. I sat down and I was finished - my "expert" testimony was stenographed, and I sat down.
Later, the patient went up and testified. Watching a manic patient with pressured speech interact with a judge is kind of funny, by the way. I forget that we interact with mental illness all the time and understand it, but most people don't. The judge asked him some questions and made the decision. He was to be discharged in a week.
And now, I can say that I have given testimony in court. Very (un)easy but a very cool experience.
Peace,
Ahmed